The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
His whole point in making this was there's something beyond that. I know we're worried about lack of fiber, too much saturated fat, something else. But isn't there something to the colorants and the flavorants and the jelling agents, etc. that could be separate from all this?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in it and he in his analyses said if I if I parse that out in the data that I'm looking at that has an additive effect to all these other things and he's made a big case for it and people are publishing papers on it all the time