The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think if you're trying to learn to listen to your body, you're say, "I want to optimize my own health for a very temporary but restrictive clean eating pattern where you're having lots of fruits and vegetables and fiber and you're cutting down some of the things that cause more commonly cause certain reactions, cutting out gluten, cutting out dairy, cutting back on red meat, and then you add them back in and start to listen to how your body is functioning.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.