The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they looked at the acidity and alkalinity of the diets and they found that these were pretty balanced in fact one child ate a balance of acid and alkaline foods meaning meat being typically acidic i think i've done a controversial thoughts on this this is a little bit simplified concept but um they say that in diets of the other 14 there was a preponderance of the potentially alkaline in every six month period
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
generally kids will mix and balance acidic and alkaline foods
we see in kids that at least from the 1930s and 1940s if children between six months and two years are presented with a variety of foods they consistently eat meat and fruit occasional tubers like carrots but they do a pretty good job of balancing acid and alkaline foods