Paul Saladino· MD
what if plants are just fallback foods what if we're so ingenious in our evolution that we really only need to eat plants when we're starving if we can't get animals
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what if plants are just fallback foods what if we're so ingenious in our evolution that we really only need to eat plants when we're starving if we can't get animals
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I do think like you suggested our ancestors ate plants throughout our evolution my premise is that it really only happened most of the time when they were during times of starvation as major food staples