The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
within the last 100 years they've only been able to track this since like the 1920s maybe the 1940s but essentially depending on what paper you look at you've lost 25 up to 80 percent of all vitamin and mineral content this is among apples this is broccoli this is carrots this is potatoes this is onions this is every quote produce out there it's like a minimum 20 nutrient loss
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
within the last hundred years they've only been able to track this since like the 1920s maybe the 1940s but essentially depending on what paper you look at you've lost 25 up to 80 percent of all vitamin and mineral content this is among apples this is broccoli this is carrots this is potatoes this is onions this is every quote produce out there it's like a minimum 20 nutrient loss
since we are growing food in dirt we see 50% less nutrient density of even healthy food like broccoli has less minerals and it did 50 years ago