The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so yeah I I'm pretty certain that you know for the majority of the population including at least some you know even if it's just some muscles or noise stirs and these small things that you know actually are extremely nutrient dense and have a lot of things that are missing from the plant kingdom could be a beneficial thing to
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
animal foods are the most nutrient-dense foods we have particularly organ meats i think people are really lacking in that department so regardless of what diet you eat if you can include animal animal foods with with organ meats i think that's going to be really beneficial
there are a lot of nutrients that you're just not you know i mean we have to we have to eat again a variety of animal source tissues and not just muscle meat but most people you know their idea of meat is muscle meat you know their idea of of nutrition is is that and um you know it's you know you might not get enough if that's all you're eating is muscle meat right
that that animals and organs are critically nutritious and that plants 100 percent and for some people they can be really bad and other people they can serve a role um in in some way