Paul Saladino· MD
the cattle actually are utilizing this vast resource that we can't directly utilize as a food source for humans
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the cattle actually are utilizing this vast resource that we can't directly utilize as a food source for humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
cows eat grass humans can't eat grass you know like we don't we don't need that land you know it's not even tillable land cows can pass you're on land that's you know rocky and it's up and down it's hilly you can't even make crops on that land so to say that cows are using space that we could use to make other food is wrong and and humans can't eat grass and so basically cows are turning grass into steak which to me is the most magical thing you could imagine
Cows are amazing because cows uh grass so that we don't have to because humans can't eat grass, right? So, cows can eat grass. They take the nutrients from the grass, they put it in their butter, and then they put it in the meat, and we benefit from it.