Peter Attia· MD
while we know of at least two significant environmental triggers for cancer smoking and obesity and I'll say more about obesity in a second
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
while we know of at least two significant environmental triggers for cancer smoking and obesity and I'll say more about obesity in a second
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we have very little insight about if at all foods you know specific Foods at isocaloric amount so we can talk about an abundance of food because that factors into the Obesity trigger but if we're talking about a bunch of people eating an isocaloric energy balanced diet again despite all of the propaganda around this oh red meat this or soy that or whatever there's actually just the scantest of evidence to suggest that any of these are promoting cancer in the slightest way