The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I'm saying no he's not I'm saying he probably has at least pre-diabetes and the reason that his doctors aren't aware of that is because he wasn't aware of it for one thing because 9 out of 10 people with pre-diabetes which is the condition that means you're on your way to developing diabetes 9 out of 10 people are not told by their doctor that they have it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.