Andrew Huberman· PhD
the gold standard is a DEA or even an MRI but no one can afford that so we have in like what I have um in my office is the inbody scanner so it's electrical impedance scanner and it's it's pretty good
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the gold standard is a DEA or even an MRI but no one can afford that so we have in like what I have um in my office is the inbody scanner so it's electrical impedance scanner and it's it's pretty good
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you want I mean we can we can get into that. Yeah. It's it's so with the visceral fat and like I said, you know, visceral fat is something if you really directly want to measure it, you do a DEXA scan. But you know, for the average person that isn't going to go out and do a DEXA scan, waist circumference is a proxy. It's used in a lot of studies.