Andrew Huberman· PhD
for a female if it's less than 0.7 then your chance of having clinically significant aberration in visceral fat are low and then if it's greater than one you likely have higher levels of visceral fat
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for a female if it's less than 0.7 then your chance of having clinically significant aberration in visceral fat are low and then if it's greater than one you likely have higher levels of visceral fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.