The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if you have an individual who's overnourished and adequately muscled right so they're overweight but they actually have a sufficient amount of muscle mass and they need to go into a caloric deficit we would certainly tolerate also a little bit of a protein deficit in that individual not because I think it's necessary but because I think it's easier to hit caloric targets if you are able to relax your protein targets
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
conversely if a person is overnourished and under muscled I think we do have to tow that fine line of keeping protein High because that person needs to be putting on muscle as they're losing fat