The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we do what we can get away with right so a lot of people you know typically I talk about this a lot in discussions and in talks that I give about how you know we tend to see what's the most amount of food I can eat at this meal and not to feel like crap or what's the most amount of this cheesecake I can have and not you know blow up or what's the most amount I can eat over a course of several days and not gain weight so we tend to we go right up to the edge of what we can do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.