The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
with obesity it's a little harder because the hazard ratio isn't nearly as large as it is with tobacco and obesity is is actually harder to disentangle from its other multivariate parameters it comes with so much else so the person who is obese eats a different way sleeps a different way exercises a different way the list goes on and on and on of other things that could that could potentially play a role
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
with obesity it's a little harder because the hazard ratio isn't nearly as large as it is with tobacco
obesity is is actually harder to disentangle from its other multivariate parameters it comes with so much else so the person who is obese eats a different way sleeps a different way exercise is a different way the list goes on and on and on of other things that could that could potentially play a role