The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The American public trusted the government. They trusted the scientists. And when they said, fat's bad, carbs are good, everybody listened. Eggs are bad. Eggs are bad, fat's bad, cholesterol is bad, red meats. So people ate less red meat, they ate less eggs, they ate less fat, and then we got SnackWell cookies. We got low fat ice cream and like. And the sugar just went through the roof. And so that's when you see this explosive rise.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.