The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
There are controlled feeding studies showing VERY clearly that when humans eat ultra processed food they are hungrier and eat MORE... vs. humans eating unprocessed meat and plant foods who achieve satiety sooner eating about 500 calories LESS per day.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but people gained weight on Ultra processed foods and actually lost weight on the non-processed food diet so it's very clear that Ultra processed foods you guys know what I'm talking about Cookies Cakes candies crackers breads these sorts of things versus unprocessed Foods real meat fruit vegetables were included in this study
we know at the first level we know that processed food is not as satiating as regular food calorie for calorie gram per gram of macronutrients carbohydrates protein fat or matched sugars mashed salt is matched fiber is matched it's not a satiating it makes you hungry
Ultra processed diets obviously I'm eating an unprocessed diet cause excess calorie intake and weight gain