The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is evidence for example that obesity prone people um that they have a flora of gut microbiome or sorry a gut microflora that is better able to extract energy from the foods ate now that could be reverse causation as well it could be that obese people eat a diet that causes this kind of gut microflora to bloom
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is evidence for example that obesity prone people um that they have a flora of gut microbiome or sorry a gut microflora that is better able to extract energy from the foods ate now that could be reverse causation as well it could be that obese people eat a diet that causes this kind of gut microf florid to bloom you know so on and so forth so we got to be careful about establishing you know correlation versus causation