The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can always have pathologically high levels of glucose in your bloodstream you know so that you would be pre or post diabetic and your glycogen stores are always full your body will only ever store fat will never burn it and so that that becomes senescent it gives off terrible and lavatories cytokines the adipose tissue that is surrounding your visceral organs like basically pollute those organs with these pro-inflammatory cytokines
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.