Peter Attia· MD
so strongly that we think that there's a causal link based on all everything that we know about epidemiology
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so strongly that we think that there's a causal link based on all everything that we know about epidemiology
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if we pause it that indeed obesity plays a causal role in cancer there's no dispute that the correlation is quite strong that i i mean i you you don't need to be an epidemiologist to understand that the question is is that correlation causative
if we pause it that indeed obesity plays a causal role in cancer there's no dispute that the correlation is quite strong