Peter Attia· MD
I want you to be aware that I have no data on this over many decades we only have a few years I want you to be aware that it was only tested thoroughly in these populations which is not your population
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I want you to be aware that I have no data on this over many decades we only have a few years I want you to be aware that it was only tested thoroughly in these populations which is not your population
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the first and the second are true and what they really tell you is therefore the cost benefit analysis has to be viewed through the lens of that patient population in other words when you ask the question about risk and benefit you have to at least acknowledge that the long-term risk long-term benefit are studied in that population and as such this is what the data are these are the risks these are the benefits make your judgment