The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And then velocity. It's got to be quick and easy to eat. It's got to be a food that you can just pound a bunch of calories in one sitting and want to just keep going. And once they sort of lock that in, you start to see that's really you start to see obesity take off in the 70s in the US
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
sacking was not a sort of cultural thing until about 1970 and once people start to really snack I mean this becomes this is a concerted Movement by the food industry to go okay uh how do we sell more food right well let's invent this category called snacking and once you see snacking start to take off I think you really start to see the rise in obesity in our country
once people start to really snack I mean this becomes this is a concerted Movement by the food industry to go okay uh how do we sell more food right well let's invent this category called snacking and once you see snacking start to take off I think you really start to see the rise in obesity in our country and then have it trickle out across the world in 1970
and once you see snacking start to take off I think you really start to see the rise in obesity in our country and then have it trickle out across the world in 1970