The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
However, if you take those same cohort of people, give them EPA, and I think it was somewhere around two grams, and then inject them with lipopolysaccharide. We're establishing causation here, right? It totally, the depressive symptoms, versus a placebo.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you can blunt that depressive symptom effect with EPA probably because of the inflammatory the blunting of the inflammatory response and there have been some you know this is like this is a field that's again underst studied underfunded but you know some preliminary evidence randomized control trials small randomized control trials that need to be of course repeated with larger sample sizes you know they're basically showing that supplementation with EPA can help with depression
and you can blunt that depressive symptom effect with EPA probably because of the inflammatory the blunting of the inflammatory response