Paul Saladino· MD
basically the take home here is that you can get plenty of omega-3 without fish and you'll avoid all the other toxins in the fish
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
basically the take home here is that you can get plenty of omega-3 without fish and you'll avoid all the other toxins in the fish
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you say paul what about my omega-3s can i get enough omega-3s without eating fish absolutely
absolutely you can talk about this on a previous podcast you can get plenty of Omega-3s specifically EPA and DHA are the ones you really want to focus on and even ala alphal linic acid can be converted into DHA easily when you don't have excess amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids that is things like linolic acid and Seed oils in your diet