The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So we know that having a diet where they fail to supplement in a way that there's a high omega-6 to three ratio, so not enough omega-3s, not only are there markers of an inflammatory cytokines, elevated things like IL-6 and TNF-alpha, but they tend to be non-responders to antidepressants.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.