The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
astaxanthin is a carotenoid that sequester's singlet oxygen which is produced by UV radiation it is also a potent antioxidant against peroxy radicals both singlet oxygen and peroxy radicals damage DNA lipids and proteins inside of your cell all of which lead to diseases of Aging
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
to summarize krill oil beats fish oil from many different perspectives the EPA and DHA president krill are more bioavailable as a consequence to phospholipids perhaps the most compelling reason that krill oil is superior to fish oil is because krill oil is a great source of DHA phosphatidylcholine the preferred source of DHA for the brain additionally krill oil comes with an added bonus of having astaxanthin a carotenoid that seems to play a role in fighting off diseases of Aging