Andrew Huberman· PhD
so most Americans that are not eating a lot of fish and they're not supplementing are probably around a 4 to 5% omega-3 index
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so most Americans that are not eating a lot of fish and they're not supplementing are probably around a 4 to 5% omega-3 index
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Most Americans have an omega-3 index of 4% and really need to be at 8% or more.
the standard I in in the US the omega-3 index most people it's about it's less than 5% so it's about 4% so most people in the United States are are at a very low omega-3 index they don't eat enough seafood and fish
I personally, as you probably know, think that most people are not getting enough omega-3. In fact, if you look at if you look at data on the omega-3 index people are mostly not. They're in the low range.
So, about 90% of the US population does not eat enough seafood and about 80% globally of the population not getting enough omega-3 from their diet.
As I mentioned, 90% of the US population does not get enough omega-3 from their diet.