Paul Saladino· MD
so yes grass-fed meat isn't gonna have a whole lot of omega-3 because the omega-3 is in the fat but if you get the grass-fed trimmings you'll get more more omega-3
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so yes grass-fed meat isn't gonna have a whole lot of omega-3 because the omega-3 is in the fat but if you get the grass-fed trimmings you'll get more more omega-3
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
grass-fed animal fat is going to have higher concentrations though grain fed animal fat doesn't have zero concentrations it's just that grass-fed animal fat has higher concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids