We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
if we accept that say we said okay an ounce of liver is too much what are we just saying liver is bad for humans like every indigenous tribe in the world eats the liver first or second or third like they don't [ __ ] around with this right like they eat liver at full stop so like every indigenous tribe all of our history that we're aware of as humans they're wrong
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.