Peter Attia· MD
What's the difference? Track and field, more power, right? A sprinter has more force being applied than a distance runner.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
What's the difference? Track and field, more power, right? A sprinter has more force being applied than a distance runner.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we do not want to be suggesting that some sports are bad for BMD. That's not the take-home message here.
So, you know, we do not want to be suggesting that some sports are bad for BMD. That's not the take-home message here. The take-home message here is if you really have to juice it, what do you want to be doing? Again, even the distance runners here, all of them. So, so you're in in the brown one, in the black one, you know, you have to look at which ones separate men versus uh women, right? So, for example, like blue um sorry um red versus um green is showing you the difference between male and female resistance training, whereas all the swimmers, all the distance runners, all the track and field athletes are in the same bucket.
And then we talk about high force impact sports such as football and MMA were associated with the highest BMD values.
Now, I'm going to say something else that's kind of unpopular. Not really sure playing college football is a great strategy for increasing your BMD when it comes with so many other injuries. um not to mention all the head trauma.