The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so osteoporosis should be really diagnosed from hip uh bmd according to the definition of the World Health Organization was that a t-core of - 2.5 is definitive of osteoporosis a tcore between 1 and minus minus1 and -2.5 is osteopenia or low bone mass
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
When you go from healthy bone to osteopenia, that represents about a 10% reduction in bone mineral density relative to a young healthy adult. And then osteoporosis is a further degradation where you hit about 25% reduction.