Paul Saladino· MD
higher rather than lower protein intakes were associated with less bone loss
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
higher rather than lower protein intakes were associated with less bone loss
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
with increasing protein consumption appear to be more beneficial for women with lower calcium intakes they were unclear about that interaction but overall the more protein the less fracture and the higher the bone density in these women
the study supports a protective role for dietary animal protein in the skeletal health of elderly women and conversely there is a negative association between vegetable protein and bone menstrual bone mineral density in both sexes