The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
normally if your doctor wants to know if you have osteopenia or osteoporosis they will send you to the Radiology clinic and they will do a standard spine and hip scan they're the normal ones from which you would diagnose those conditions not a whole body scan
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The first is the diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis is based on two locations technically three but two of them are symmetric the hips and the lumbar spine.