The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in that same p they said 8 hours in the office lighting which contains no UV exposure generates the same amount of free radical production as 30 minutes in direct sunlight but there's no infrared so you're getting none of that cleanup so then you really have an A redo problem uh an oxidative stress issue
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if we put infrared back into the environment then this could potentially solve a lot of the problems