The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because this is very much in my mind uh like comparing um smoked cannabis uh let's just say there is no typical variety but um compared to a highly concentrated uh uh THC tincture for instance I mean there same chemical structure but at some point the phocinetics changes and you're basically looking at different brain circuits different bodily organs engaged
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.