The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So you get to the progesterines like nandrallone which seem to have like a an additive effect because progesterone receptor agonism seems to be a stimulation. It actually provides uh stimulative input on breast tissue development too. Like there's other things besides estrogen that stimulate breast tissue. So you have GH also and IGF-1 stimulate breast tissue development. Um estrogen, progesterone, u prolactin.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
like there's other things besides estrogen that stimulate breast tissue so you have GH also and igf-1 stimulate breast tissue development um um estrogen progesterone um prolactin
so you get to the progestin like nandrolone which seem to have like a an additive effect because progesterone receptor agonism seems to be a stimulation it actually provides uh stimulative input on breast tissue development too