The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so all pharmaceuticals what about 80 of them are derived from plant metabolites so originally these things are in plants and what we found through herbalism through the course of human history is hey what's the right dose where this thing isn't poisoned enough poisonous enough to really harm you but just enough to cause an effect that maybe you want for some kind of allopathic reason
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
here's um what i would contend there's no difference between the word poison in the word medicine except for dose so something like if somebody thinks of any kind of pharmaceutical typically in the right dose that's poison and in the small enough dose it can trigger some kind of therapeutic effect