Peter Attia· MD
And then Tony Hunter showed that actually by thin layer, the molecule that was thought to be phosphothreonine was actually phosphotyrosine. And phosphotyrosine had never been seen as the product of a protein kinase before.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then Tony Hunter showed that actually by thin layer, the molecule that was thought to be phosphothreonine was actually phosphotyrosine. And phosphotyrosine had never been seen as the product of a protein kinase before.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.