The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these have drugs that have been around for many many decades and they target dividing cells and that's why these side effects exist hair falls out because hair is dividing you get sor in your mouth because the cells the the epithelial cells in your mouth are dividing and so they're very non-specific
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
drugs such as docar rubison or what's also known as adriamycin the Red Devil uh taxine type drugs called ply taxol or taxol alkal drugs like cyclop fosmid or carboplatin very widely use chemotherapy drugs and maybe just for folks to understand how these things all have something in common which is they're basically anti-proliferative drugs
drugs such as docar rubison or what's also known as adriamycin the Red Devil uh taxine type drugs called ply taxol or taxol alkal drugs like Cy lamide uh or carop platin very widely used chemotherapy drugs and maybe just for folks to understand how these things all have something in common which is they're basically anti-proliferative drugs as you said they're old school dirty drugs these are drugs that have been around for many many decades and they target dividing cells and that's why these side effects exist hair falls out because hair is dividing you get sores in your mouth because the cells the the epithelial cells in your mouth are dividing and so they're very non specific