Peter Attia· MD
Those compounds are more suppressive too because they interact with the progesterone receptor significantly. So it's like you get the negative feedback not just through AR er but PR as well.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Those compounds are more suppressive too because they interact with the progesterone receptor significantly. So it's like you get the negative feedback not just through AR er but PR as well.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
those compounds are more suppressive too cuz they interact with the progesterone receptor significantly so it's like you get the negative feedback not just through AR ER but PR as well
those compounds are more suppressive too because they interact with the progesterone receptor significantly so it's like you get the negative feedback not just through AR ER but PR as well