The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's this other group, the heart group, which is really uh a proponent for this 7 hydroxy product and saying that it's out there to reduce harm. It's out there to help people benefit from a product that is not an opioid, right? But it is purely an opioid, but it's not a prescription opioid. And they're saying it's reducing harm weight. I don't know that anybody has evidence to demonstrate that yet. There's no solid evidence.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I don't know that anybody has evidence to demonstrate that yet. There's no solid evidence.