The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there has been a sort of race in the scientific Community consisting of two groups one set of groups trying to establish the toxicity of MDMA so that it does not become legal again and another group trying to establish the utility and the lack of toxicity in MDMA so that it does become legal again for the treatment of PTSD
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.