The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can have too little and too much same with methylene blue you can have too little and too much you don't want to accept too many electrons these electrons need to be flowing to the places they should be flowing as opposed to oxidative stress the polar opposite of that is called reductive stress and that too has been found in people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and some other disorders
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.