The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So we are using this um I'm sure you know something about it but it's actually there are very few groups in the world currently using this. It's called transcranial electric stimulation with temporal interference >> testy. Um, and the basic idea of this is that if you have two electrodes that are stimulating at a very high carrier frequency, say 15 kilhertz, which is essentially from all we know, the brain is not responsive to a 15 kilhertz signal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.