The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think you see this in a lot of pharmaceuticals as well like the the the addiction rate for uh prescribed drugs that are controlled where the dose and the timing is controlled the addiction rates for those are way lower simply because there's no there's no unpredictability there's no game behind it all
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
with methodone you find that once you make the drug um predictable in the sense that like the environment becomes predictable the timing of when you get it becomes predictable the dose becomes predictable you start to see people be able to Wayne off of drugs and in fact people who use methodone often won't get high from the drug and I think you see this in a lot of pharmaceuticals as well like the the the addiction rate for uh prescribed drugs that are controlled where the dose and the timing is controlled the addiction rates for those are way lower simply because there's no there's no unpredictability there's no game behind it