The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if that was all just nerd speak for those listening it's one in the context of amphetamines what you're doing is you're taking an endogenous system a naturally occurring system and you're greatly amplifying the amount of dopamine the amount of norepinephrine that's available
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
amphetamine is a strong dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake blocker so it prevents what's already been released from being taken back up so more is available longer but in addition to that amphetamine is a pretty potent to a vesicle manipulator so it's actually forcing a bigger release from the vesicles when
in addition to that amphetamine is a pretty potent to a vesicle manipulator so it's actually forcing a bigger release from the vesicles when they're synaptically released