The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I've seen people use abusive dosages of aromatase inhibitors serums just to tolerate the androgen input some of the drugs that are substrates for aromatase. So it's like to use the drugs I need to gain the muscle, I'm going to get gyno development, which I can't have on stage cuz it looks cosmetically not pleasing and I'll get marked down for it. So I'm going to use aggressive Novadex and aromatase inhibitors while I'm using the androgens to prevent gyno.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I'm going to use aggressive Nova decks and aromatase Inhibitors while I'm using the androgens to prevent gyno so I can gain the muscle without the estrogen but it's like you can just imagine the androgenic signaling plus no estrogen it's like uh like horrible constellation of negative problematic factors