Andrew Huberman· PhD
the plant basedratom products that were still close to the plant seem like it's a maybe scenario. Kids and people up to 18, maybe 21 or even 25, it's a hard no. Stay away from it.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the plant basedratom products that were still close to the plant seem like it's a maybe scenario. Kids and people up to 18, maybe 21 or even 25, it's a hard no. Stay away from it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.