The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well I mean I don't think it's unethical because I think they are they are basically saying look it's a different drug and it's you know you can change one molecule uh on a drug and it completely changes the way it works
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well I mean I don't think it's unethical because I think they are they are basically saying look it's a different drug and it's you know you can change one molecule uh on a drug and it completely changes the way it works