The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the human studies there's a lot of Vari you know there's it's controversial because there's a lot of like there's some crap studies and there's just a lot of variability in the effects across studies I think some of that's just because you ask people to squirt it up their own noses and so there's a lot of that introduces variation in in just how good they were getting it in the right place
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.