The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you approve something under emergency use authorization which is the same sort of permission you would give to an investigational new drug you were really under no ethical obligation to vaccinate a placebo group you aren't and nor are you under ethical obligation to no longer do placebo-controlled trials
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
why is that paul is that basically as a thank you to the control group and basically a crossover look at what that does from a scientific standpoint you just lost your test case but what is the rationale for doing that i think it's a thank you for being and that may have been part of the deal when they signed up for the trial i don't know